Wednesday 10 March 2010

Brown Strikes Football and PR

A bit of a random post this- a far from inclusive summary of things that have been on my mind since my last post.

Firstly just a cursory message of support for those public sector workers on the picket lines last week. If the prospect of being laid off in these grim times (still grim even if not still an official recession) were not bad enough- the prospect of being laid off for considerably less than was previously agreed contractually is even more grim. I would like to know what the governments official stance is on large employers trying to renegotiate redundancy terms before cutbacks? It is a bit like offering workers an umbrella on a rainy day then, as it clouds over, replacing it with a cocktail stick parasol. (albeit a cocktail parasol worth up to £60,000 or the equivalent of three years service whatever is lower).

The principle issue of the strike however is not really the detail of the redundancy package- but the fact that the government should make such explicit preparations to lay off so many public sector workers. bakers create the crisis, the public carry the cost, and public servants pay off the debt. It is hardly fair, and fairness is what we should demand of our politicians. Besides, in order for the government's fresh redundancy proposals to be necessary a significant proportion of public sector works face the prospect of the dole queue. With that in mind the strike deserves our support.

Secondly Brown. Poor old Gordon Brown. No sooner has he finished his tete a tete with Piers Morgan than he tries to elbow in next to Adrian Chiles onMatch of the Day. One would hope Brown had more significant things on his mind than Theo Walcott's disappointing form in world cup year. Although his take on Portsmouth's current financial woes would be genuinely interesting.

Brown's PR problems are well documented. It seems the paparazzi cannot resist snapping his face in midst contortion. Brown initially tried to improve his public image by taking smiling classes, and wearing a maniacal grin as false a Tony Blair's. He overlooked the fact the public did not take to Blair's grin- we always knew it was false. We were subdued by the inscrutable control of his emotions- Blair only ever had/has two expressions. Manic false smile or mock grave concern. As false as these expressions are they were somehow more convincing than Brown's tutored emoting. No matter how many prime time shows Brown appears on he just lacks the charm to play the part of man of the people. And charm just can't be learned on the lap of PR gurus.

This is the principle difference between the Brown and Blair. Charm. And there ability to sound and look plausible and likeable when falsifying. There was never a gaping ideological gulf between them. Put simply Blair was just a more convincing liar than Brown. He tricked more voters (this one back in 1997) with his lies and media-spun truths than Brown can and will. It was merely a flagrant abuse of his talent for partial truths/lies which led to Blair's political demise. Brown's will most probably come as result of being a less convincing liar at than either Blair or Cameron.

This is the soul of cynicism at the heart of my political engagement. Overall it is probably healthier to assume our politicians are misleading us and to let them prove otherwise. To do this requires that the electorate demonstrate greater faith in the political process than we currently have (not trust in the politicians but faith in the process!). And with that faith comes greater expectation, and subsequent accountability on the side of those elected. We need to expect more from our leaders- and they need to be held up to account more rigourously. This requires a level of dialogue and engagement that can't be attained through PR channels- MoTd, This Morning, the Piers Morgan show, or any tabloid newspaper. We do not need our leaders to have greater visibility- we do not need to feel that we 'know' them. Power itself needs to be disseminated from the centre to the people, and in order for this to be meaningful we need a devolved government with proper powers. Hence Plaid in Wales innit.

1 comment:

Sabrina said...

HOW WELSH ARE YOU? – Creative Work Contest
Prize:
Gift basket provided by National Museum Wales.
Name, picture and work will be displayed on National Museum Wales Web site.
Submissions:
All entries must be submitted to contemporarycomm@gmail.com by Thursday, April 22, 2010.
Entries can include videos, drawings, paintings, songs, poems, embroidery, clothing or any other
form of original creative work.
Judging:
Judging will take place in May 2010.
Entries will be reviewed by Contemporary Communications, the host of the “How Welsh Are
You?” contest. Entries will be judged on the following guidelines:
1. Originality, uniqueness, reflection of creative thinking, style and expression.
2. Demonstration of knowledge of Wales’ culture, customs and/or traditions.
3. Appropriateness and relationship to subject.
Criteria
1. Must be at least 18 years or older to enter the contest.
2. All video submissions must be at least 30 seconds minimum length and no longer than
two minutes maximum length.
3. Must be original work by the author.
4. Each submission must be accompanied by proper registration information. Each entry
must be clearly labeled with: entrant(s) name, school/organization/society (if available),
mailing address, main contact e-mail address, contact phone number, and creative title of
the work.
5. The works must display a general sense of Welsh culture, either in the United States or in
Wales. This contest helps those who are of Welsh culture (or enjoy Welsh culture)
express the importance of it, while demonstrating what it means to be of Welsh decent.
Rules
1. All entries become the property of the National Museum Wales and may be used in
whole or in part by the National Museum Wales at its discretion.
2. The grand prize winner additionally grants to the National Museum Wales all rights, title
and interest, including, without limitation, all copyrights and exploitation rights in any
media of his/her entry without payment or further consent.
3. All required application and entry forms must be completed in full.
4. The entry may not depict any trademarks or copyrighted materials, logos or brand names
in the creative work, on costumes, equipment and props, with the exception of any Wales
official logos, flags and /or national symbols.